We believe that by educating the public about the fallacies of climate change theories and the Kyoto Protocol, we can weaken political support for Kyoto implementation.
Specifically, Mills complained, "[The] Climate Change Secretariat would not allow Kyoto science skeptics such as [FoS scientific advisor] Professor Tim Patterson , a leading paleo-climatoligist, into the Kyoto public consultations sessions held in June. Find out how to become a Friend of Gaslands here. While some of the smaller oil and gas companies have occasionally contributed because their leaders are often earth scientists who are sympathetic to our fight on scientific grounds, so-called 'big oil' is generally absent in our list of donors. Favorite Place. Until July, when the Canada Gazette which announces new federal regulation published an ominous proposed change.
24/05/ · Friends Of Gas - Nürnberg. Public · Hosted by FRIENDS OF GAS, dq and 2 others. clock. Monday, May 24, at AM UNK – PM UNK. pin. Z-Bau. Frankenstraße , Nuremberg, Germany. Show Map. Hide Map. Performance & Event Venue +49 [email protected] Get Directions. Hosted by. FRIENDS OF GAS.
- Former FoS chief scientific advisor Tim Ball has made remarkably similar statements to Harper's, including this one from June
- Contribute to this page Suggest an edit or add missing content.
- Who's transferring and who's projecting?
- Contribute to this page Suggest an edit or add missing content.
12/11/2019 · FRIENDS OF GAS “CARRARA”1. KALTER APPARAT2. CARRARA3. VOM MÜSSEN- to be released 15. November 2019 via Staatsakt- 12" EP/ SINGLE Vinyl limited 500Nov 22, 2...Author: FRIENDS OF GAS
FRIENDS OF GAS - Kollektives Träumen (Live) - YouTube
Sep 11, 2015 · FRIENDS OF GAS - Kollektives Träumen (Live im Altgiesinger am 26. August 2015)FRIENDS OF GAS sind Nina Walser, Veronica Burnuthian, Thomas Westner, Tagar und...
Sell This Version. LC Friends Of Gas, Lafote. Friends Of Gas, Lafote - La Palma / Und all die Hummeln (7", Single, Num, Mar) Kant. LC
Friends Of Gas. Get Directions
Governments subsidize fossil fuels to lower the price of the production and consumption of fossil fuels, so the economy Friends Of Gas population can receive cheaper fuels. However, fossil fuel subsidies FFS have a series of negative effects.
Fossil-fuel subsidy reform is the missing piece of the climate change jigsaw and governments must deliver global actions to decrease emissions as we head towards implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. Removing these subsidies frees up resources to invest in sustainable development for society such Britney Amber Feet health, education, public welfare and low-carbon energy pathways.
Environmental: Removing fossil-fuel subsidies leads to emissions reductions in a world dealing with the impacts of climate change and alleviates local air pollution. Fossil-fuel subsidies are a poor social welfare policy and counter-intuitively tend to benefit wealthier consumers. Low-carbon future: Fossil-fuel subsidies Friends Of Gas us back from a low carbon future and lock us into a high carbon one. Reform levels the playing field for clean and renewable energy solutions.
A series of five virtual interactive roundtables took place in with the participation Friends Of Gas representatives from around 20 countries from around the world. Ga video recording of the High-Level Media launch event can be Friends Of Gas here.
Why reform fossil fuel subsidies Governments subsidize fossil fuels to lower the price of Oma Extrem production and consumption of fossil fuels, so the economy and population can Off cheaper fuels.
Recent supporters include Estonia United Kingdom Morocco Netherlands Samoa Italy Mexico Marshall Islands Uruguay Moldova Czech Republic Friendz Colombia Peru Croatia Malaysia Uganda Austria Philippines Cyprus Ghana Mozambique Canada Monaco Viet Nam Germany United States. View full list of supporters. Become a Supporter.
You've been told about global warming, right? You know, take the One Tonne Challenge, turn down your heat and cool the planet. But have you been told the truth? Are you really causing global warming? Find out: watch our video at friendsofscience. If you said yes, you've been misled. Get the real answers at friendsofscience. Elections Canada rules on third party advertising cover any advertising message "that promotes or opposes a registered party or the election of a candidate, including one that takes a position on an issue with which a registered party or candidate is associated" and requires such advertisers to register with the Chief Electoral Officer.
The Friends of Science Society does not appear on the list of registered third-party advertisers for the election and to all appearances has not met any of the obligations of third party advertisers. In an email dated May 9, , Albert Jacobs of the Friends of Science stated: "The radio ads instead of TV which we can't afford were also paid that way [i. Their sole goal was to get people to look at our website. Since we have been accused by some that we were making political propaganda during an election campaign, I would like to point out, that the ads were contracted and started before any election call.
They ran their course and were non-political to the extent that Kyoto is a scientific environmental matter. In any case, they were not partisan. That an election was called was not our doing. On November 1, , the U of C student newspaper the Gauntlet reported that FoS maintained there was no need to register, as the campaign was planned well before the election call:. There was no election. There was nothing to register. We felt, ultimately, it was a happy coincidence because we were unhappy with the party line that was coming out of Ottawa from some of the political parties and we thought, 'holy smokes, that was good timing on our part.
However, in the FoS July, newsletter at the time of initial planning and fundraising efforts for the ad campaign , FoS made its ultimate goal very clear :. We have enough funds in the bank to keep going for only another 6 months. Our goal is to have a major impact on the next election. Consider a donation to help us stay in the fight [emphasis added]. The source of the polling information used to select the targeted ridings is not confirmed, but typically riding-specific trends are tracked only by internal party polls.
Presumably "some of the political parties" whose "party line" FoS was "unhappy" with included the Liberal Party but not the Conservatives. In a report to Parliament , the Chief Electoral Officer, Jean-Pierre Kingsley, explained that four questions need be answered in the affirmative to obtain a finding of "third party election advertising". Assuming the relatively straightforward determination that a given message is an advertising message transmitted to the public during an election period, the crucial question would be: "[I]s the message one that a reasonable person would understand … as taking a position on an issue with which a candidate or party is associated?
In early November, Kevin Grandia of desmogblog. The first mainstream press revelations about the FoS ad campaign came in a February 17, report by Mike De Souza of CanWest New Service. The university did not endorse the radio ads, nor were we aware the ads were being aired and that monies donated to the university were being used for that purpose. Our concern about the use of funds for advertising is clearly reflected in the position we have taken with Friends of Science.
In the wake of these revelations, Liberal public works critic Mark Holland called for a parliamentary inquiry to determine the identity of the donors: "It's clear that this ad campaign was used for very partisan purposes, and it may have influenced some seats, so it's imperative that we know where that money was coming from. Meanwhile, Conservative spokesperson Ryan Sparrow denied any connection between the Conservatives and FoS: "The Conservative party has no affiliation with the Friends of Science.
The Liberal party should be honest. Do they want to limit the freedom of speech of third-party organizations? However, CanWest reported that the ad campaign was apparently managed by PR specialist and Conservative activist Morten Paulsen now a vice-president at Fleishman-Hillard , who also served as "an upaid spinner" for the Conservatives during the election.
Reacting to the reports, Liberal MP Mark Holland stated: "It seems that not only were the Friends of Science working with the Conservatives, it looks like their campaign spokesperson might have been directing what ridings specifically material went into and using the group as an arm of the Conservative Party of Canada and thus circumventing campaign financing rules and all of the restrictions that other parties would have faced.
Chipeur is also the "Conservative party's long-time Alberta lawyer" and was one of many partisan appointees to the judicial advisory committees responsible for appointment of federal judges. In a previous letter to an individual complainant, Ms. Moise elaborated on EC's finding.
To the extent that all of the major parties in the federal election acknowledged the problem of global warming and were taking steps to address it, though in different ways, the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois with the Kyoto accord, and the Conservatives with a Made in Canada approach it would be difficult to conclude that the audio statements by taking a position on global warming, were targeting one particular party or candidate or a particular party's policy.
At the beginning of the election campaign, the Liberal party website listed "Our Environment" as one of six overarching issues in the Liberal platform.
The website environmental platform had four sub-sections including "Addressing Climate Change" and "Meeting our Kyoto goals". Besides detailing the Liberal government's plans to regulate industry in order to reduce greenhouse gases by up to megatonnes per year in the Kyoto compliance period, the platform expressed strong support for the scientific basis of Kyoto, stating "Climate change is real.
The platform p. In the October, FoS newsletter no longer available on the FoS website, but now uploaded to SourceWatch , Douglas Leahey stated the ad campaign was part of FoS's response to the Liberal government's proposal to regulate greenhouse gases as "toxic substances under Canada's Environmental Protection Act. Until July, when the Canada Gazette which announces new federal regulation published an ominous proposed change.
In other words, industries like oil and gas production could be federally taxed — not for what they produce, but for what they emit. Other high emission industries, like Ontario auto production would also be affected, had they not have been exempted from the terms of Kyoto by Ottawa. Every MLA in Canada has been a mailed a letter on the issue, with a copy of our video. Recently, an advertising campaign was kicked off in the province of Ontario to educate Canadians about the myths of Kyoto, and asking voters to demand answers from their MPs… Friends of Science will ensure that domestic pressure to walk away from Kyoto gets stronger and stronger.
In the aftermath of the election, Leahey once again tied the ad campaign to opposition to Kyoto: "For our part, Friends has plans to increase our successful advertising and awareness campaigns.
We believe that by educating the public about the fallacies of climate change theories and the Kyoto Protocol, we can weaken political support for Kyoto implementation. One of the ads specifically attacks to the Liberal government program "One Tonne Challenge" . A reduction of 3 degrees C at night or when you are away during the day provides optimal savings and can reduce your GHGs by half a tonne. The transcript of the Rick Mercer One Tonne Challenge ad includes the following narration:.
Why's it happening? Driving our cars, heating and cooling our homes, just using energy the way we all do, we each produce over 5 tonnes of greenhouse gases and other pollution every single year. In a challenge aimed at this and other similar Liberal government messages, the FoS One Tonne Challenge ad responds: "But have you been told the truth?
The other ad attacks Kyoto spending in general, exhorting listeners "ask your MPs why they want to spend billions on global warming theories. The "global warming myths" of this ad refer to specific Liberal government statements explaining climate change to the Canadian public, justifying the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
As seen above, the One Tonne Challenge refers to "greenhouse gases and other pollution" implying that greenhouse gases were a form of pollution. The government's climate change website stated: "The 20th century has been the warmest globally in the past years.
Many listeners perceived the radio ads as having a political, anti-Kyoto message, according to FoS presidenat Douglas Leahey: "The response was intense. Media reports about the FoS Ontario ad campaign have been few, but all have characterized the ads as "anti-Kyoto" including stories and columns referenced above from the Daily Oil Bulletin, the Gauntlet and the Calgary Sun.
For example, the Gauntlet editorial on the Friends of Science declared: "The ads themselves don't promote the Conservatives, but they certainly took a position on Kyoto, a protocol the federal Liberals had signed on to.
According to Licia Corbella's column in the Calgary Sun, Leahey explained the motivation for the ads at the kickoff news conference at the Calgary Chamber of Commerce: "We saw billions, if not trillions of dollars being earmarked for the Kyoto protocol and we felt very concerned that science was being pushed aside by hysteria over global warming.
One of the ads specifically refers to the Liberal government program "One Tonne Challenge". This program was also roundly criticized by many in the Conservative Party. For example, Bob Mills, the Conservative environment critic and therefore the official spokesperson on environmental issues , excoriated the program in an online newsletter entitled "High cost of the Kyoto Accord - December 7, ".
He stated: "The One Tonne Challenge is just another example of rampant government waste in Ottawa. Bob Mills in the same newsletter referenced above stated:. And you thought the gun registry was the poster child of profligate waste". Bob Mills welcomed the testimony of FoS then-President Charles Simpson and FoS scientific advisor Tim Patterson at hearings before the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development and told them:.
Like you, I am very afraid we're going to spend billions of dollars on programs that really will make little or no difference to Canada or to the world. The advertising statements regarding the science of climate change also echo Conservative positions on specific scientific issues, as seen in each of the "myths" described, and declared to be false, in the second FoS ad:.
Here are some statements from environment critic Bob Mills on this issue as Canadian Alliance environment critic :. He says that there is no proof that extreme weather is caused by global warming.
There are no indications that Mr. Mills or the Conservative Party might have changed their position on this issue in This is a reference to the finding in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Third Assesment Report that current global temperatures are "likely" warmer than at any time in the last thousand years.
This finding was famously illustrated by the "hockey stick" graph taken from the landmark study by Michael Mann et al The graph shows gradually descending Northern Hemisphere temperatures since AD, followed by a sharp rise since Previously, it had been thought that during the so-called Medieval Warm Period, the earth was significantly warmer than today and of course the graph of temperature trends looked much different.
This position concerning global temperature is elaborated in an FoS web article entitled "The destruction of the hockey stick". In that article, FoS criticizes the "hockey stick", stating that "the well-documented Medieval Warm Period approx.
In answer to a January, Montreal Economic Institute questionnaire concerning the Kyoto Protocol, the Conservative Party stated:. Is CO2 really a poisonous, hazardous waste? We seem to talk about CO2 being hazardous. From my biology background, I have basically always thought of CO2 as being the basis of photosynthesis, necessary for all life on earth, and very valuable.
This echoed the long standing position of Stephen Harper himself, as stated in October, and never repudiated since that time :. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Official Conservative environmental policy at the time of the election campaign kickoff and at the time of initial airing of the FoS ads can be found in Section I of the Conservative Policy Declaration. The policy does not mention let alone acknowledge the urgency of global warming, climate change or the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The policy does call for "a review of all environment and energy initiatives, including the Kyoto Accord". It also lists the presumably higher priority issues of smog and air pollution, contaminated sites, offshore oil and gas development, Great Lakes water clean up, illegal oil dumping and aquifer mapping. Section 44 on "Alternative Energy and Alternative Fuels" lists "the expense of assuring the security of traditional fuel sources and concerns over pollution" as motivation for developing these energy sources, but pointedly omits any reference to climate change or the need to reduce greenhouse gases.
Similarly, the website summary of the Conservative environmental platform, found in the section on "Stand up for our communities" , refers to "action to ensure clean air, land, and water", but does not mention climate change. No targets for greenhouse gas reduction, even long term, are mentioned. The Conservatives' Green Brochure , released during the campaign, calls for development of "scientific monitoring of climate change", which would appear to question the scientific consensus at the time.
In summary, the Conservatives de-emphasized climate change and greenhouse gas emissions in favour of addressing other forms of air pollution, a position supported by FoS president Douglas Leahey, who wrote approvingly that "the Conservatives understand that Kyoto is a failed policy, and the difference between pollution and CO2.
The various official Conservative policy statements cited above contain no implicit or explicit acknowledgnment of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic human-caused global warming, as outlined in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.
Indeed, Conservative leader Stephen Harper often expressed skepticism about the "science", stating in fundraising letter that the Kyoto Accord was "based on tentative and contradictory scientific evidence. According to the Toronto Star, "[I]n September , Harper said this when asked about the 'greenhouse effect:' 'It's a scientific hypothesis, a controversial one and one that I think there is some preliminary evidence for.
In , as Conservative Opposition Leader, Harper had this exchange in an interview with the Frontier Center for Public Policy :. Climate is always changing. My suspicion is that human activities have some impact upon that but I think the jury is out on a lot of the actual specific trends. Imagine in a few decades. The Sun continues: "Harper's statement is at odds with the conclusions of the United Nations [IPCC report], which says science clearly shows warming will lead to 'frequently flooded coastlines, disruption to food and water supplies, and the extinction of many species.
Former FoS chief scientific advisor Tim Ball has made remarkably similar statements to Harper's, including this one from June How can you tell me that they have any idea what it's going to be like years from now if they can't tell me what the weather is going to be like in four months, or even next week? In year-end interviews and especially after the release of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report in February , Harper finally appeared to accept the scientific consensus.
As Prime Minister, Harper has sought to counter charges that he was ever a "climate change denier". A December 21, Toronto Star article cites the above statements and others and states: "Prime Minister Stephen Harper, flying in the face of his past public comments, says now he has never questioned the science behind climate change.
The Friends of Science are involved with a climate change conference, as detailed in the January, newsletter: " Barry Cooper of the University of Calgary and Tim Patterson of Carleton University are arranging a conference in Ottawa on the science of global climate change. Friends of Science is providing backup support for the event… It is anticipated the conference will result in a well-publicised discussion demonstrating that the science of global warming is far from settled, in spite of what the Kyoto supporters would have us believe.
The conference was first proposed by Friends of Science in their September, newsletter: "[W]e are focusing on a major conference to kick start the debate on climate science in Canada …" .
The only one of the 13 identified by the Star is longtime Friends of Science scientific advisor Tim Ball. In the April, FoS newsletter, President Douglas Leahey announced the postponement of the conference until September, In the October, FoS newsletter , a further postponement was announced: "The University of Calgary in early September unexpectedly cancelled its support of the meeting which had to be subsequently postponed for an indefinite period.
Although key Friends of Science projects have received major funding from charitable donations funneled through the Calgary Foundation and the University of Calgary Development Office, Roman Cooney, the University of Calgary's vice-president of external relations, has insisted from the start that the Friends of Science is neither affiliated with nor endorsed by the university.
Cooney ordered Prof. Cooper to remove it. In , the FoS website newsection made the following statement later removed : "Large projects - such as our video and radio ads - are funded through grants out of a University of Calgary Trust Fund, directed towards debate of climate science and which is also fed by the charitable Calgary Foundation.
In February, , Roman Cooney issued the following statement in an e-mail: "The University of Calgary has long-standing and publicly-stated concerns about Friends of Science using the University of Calgary's name to infer that it has the University's endorsement.
Our response has included cease-and-desist directives to the Friends of Science from the University's legal counsel. The letter is dated January 23, and was sent to Roman Cooney and is signed by FoS president Douglas Leahey.
The letter states in its entirety: "I wish to confirm that Friends of Science is not and has never been affiliated with the University of Calgary, nor does it receive, or has ever received, funding or support from the University of Calgary. The FOS website friendsofscience. FoS Board as of May 1st . Notes: Leonard F. Maier, also known as Len Maier, worked for Halliburton Services for 37 years, eventually becoming Vice-President of International Services.
As of , the Friends of Science Scientific Advisory Board included :. University of Calgary political scientist Barry Cooper is "affiliated" with the Friends of Science Society, according to his U of C biography.
ORG was registered May 9, , through Tucows Inc. The DMOZ listing reads: "Offers critical scientific evidence, including a five-piece video, that challenges the premises of the Kyoto Protocol, and presents alternative causes of climate change.
Box , Connaught Post Office Calgary, AB T2S 3B1 Phone: FAX: See Friends of Science: Articles. Wikipedia also has an article on Friends of Science. This article may use content from the Wikipedia article under the terms of the GFDL. Categories : Climate change Front groups portal Environment Front groups Consumer fronts Web fronts.
Navigation menu Personal tools Log in. India needs this sort of initiative especially because of its demographic division of young people who are perhaps unaware of their future. I think FUEL will provide them with the necessary energy to be able to move forward in life. I really feel that this is something our youth should aspire to be a part of.
Thank you for giving me an opportunity to learn something regarding the trending topics of the present times. This enabled me to learn something new that I was initially unaware of. I sincerely want to thank the training faculty for guiding us throughout the workshop. Thank you FUEL for the opportunity. Mechanical , 3D Printing. This enables to bridge the gap between the industry and academics. I got an opportunity to learn about new technologies that can come handy when we start working.
It was fun learning Digital Marketing. When FUEL came to our college for the first time, I thoroughly enjoyed the sessions that they conducted. I am now placed at Cholamandalam Finance and Investment company. I am sure that what I have learned from FUEL will definitely help me in the future. Thank you. Friend Union for Energising Lives FUEL has a collaborative culture with a hands on leadershop team making it a great place to work and grow your career.
Being an Intern in FUEL, has led to overall development of my personality, gave me an insider's view on corporate life and truly helped me in consolidating my future choices. This internship helped me in filling gap between academics to professional career. Happy to become voice for FUEL institute.
My journey with FUEL has been worth sharing,the courses provided by FUEL are really insightful and the opportunity they gave to be a ATAL FELLOW at FUEL uplifted my strengths. And exactly like that Internconnect FUEL internship helped me to evolve. FuelForNation Empowering the youth of India! Directing the Youth to a Brighter Future.
Entrepreneurship Development Mechanics Training. Become A Volunteer Be a volunteer at FUEL and contribute in building a brighter future for our nation. Our Partners A good cause can successfully be achieved with the support of dedicated helping hands. Donate Now.
Friends of Gaslands - Gaslands
12/02/2018 · Rules. If you want to produce your own accessories for Gaslands for your own personal use, then go ahead! If, however, you want to produce and sell accessories for Gaslands, then there are four rules: You must be a Friend of Gaslands. Game Accessories are cool: Designing, producing and selling physical or digital tokens, cards, dice or other gaming accessories for Gaslands is permitted, so ...Estimated Reading Time: 4 mins
24/05/ · Friends Of Gas - Nürnberg. Public · Hosted by FRIENDS OF GAS, dq and 2 others. clock. Monday, May 24, at AM UNK – PM UNK. pin. Z-Bau. Frankenstraße , Nuremberg, Germany. Show Map. Hide Map. Performance & Event Venue +49 [email protected] Get Directions. Hosted by. FRIENDS OF GAS. 18/12/ · Set up in June , the “Friends” is an informal group of non- G20 countries aiming to build political consensus on the importance of fossil fuel subsidy reform. Current of the Friends group are Costa Rica, Denmark, Ethiopia, Finland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and Uruguay. The Communiqué Events. 30/01/ · Friend of a Friend: Directed by David Storey. With Brent Butt, Gabrielle Miller, Fred Ewanuick, Eric Peterson. Lacey's friend Connie comes to Dog River and everyone's surprised by how rude she is. Lacey is skeptical, So Hank comes up with a plan to prove things once and for all. Wanda and Brent try to keep the Corner Gas rewards card program from getting out of control, Davis thinks .
Du er blevet midlertidigt blokeret
I am blown away by the reaction to the game and so excited to see people enjoying playing it, and building post-apocalyptic cars for the game. I always hoped this would Friends Of Gas the case, and fully support it. There are, inevitably, some questions of rights and ownership. For example, the designs of the templates, Friends Of Gas, and skid dice icons, not to mention the rules of Gaslands themselves, are all my own creative work.
What I wanted to do is publish some ground rules for people interested in making third-party accessories to make the process as easy as possible! Friends Of Gas out the current Friends of Gaslands here!
If you want to produce your own accessories for Gaslands for your own personal use, then go ahead! If, however, you want to produce and sell accessories for Gaslands, then there are four rules:. You are a Friend of Gaslands for as long as you are a current Patreon backer. Becoming a Friend Www Narutoxxx Com Gaslands does not constitute a licensing agreement for the Gaslands IP.
If you would like to, you may also use this little logo to show that you are a Friend of Gaslands:. May I use the Gaslands name on my Kickstarter? A Kickstarter or any crowd-funding campaign using the Gaslands name is not within the terms of the friends scheme. The reason is that the crowd-funding campaign will be seen wrongly but unavoidably as part of the Gaslands official product line.
Astrolabe have licensed from Osprey the ability to produce the official French translation of the Gaslands: Refuelled rulebook and their Kickstarter campaign is to Geilesex the production of that official translation. Rules If you want to produce your own accessories for Gaslands for your own personal use, then go ahead!
If, however, you want to produce and sell accessories for Gaslands, then Friends Of Gas are four rules: You must be a Friend of Gaslands. Feel free to use my designs, or create your own, and sell them Bordell Freital and however you like. Rules are not cool : producing and selling rules expansions, or anything that might reasonably be misinterpreted as such, are not permitted. Logos If you would like to, you may also use Friends Of Gas little logo to show that you are a Friend of Gaslands: Friends of Gaslands Logo PNG.
Sponsor Spotlight: Warden. War Rig Competition.